Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-25235219-20180717221014/@comment-25235219-20180823214205

PCAwesomeness wrote: Adsper wrote:

PCAwesomeness wrote: Why are creatures being "downgraded" due to their size? Many of the animals you listed as "tiny" are still as tall as a man, and are capable of fucking up many of the creatures on this list.

Also, I do not think the megalania should be promoted to "aggressive". That could easily be a case of poor balancing. When things become weaker, they are not as powerful. When they are not as powerful, their behavior changes. You think an animal that towers over a person that's then suddenly shrunk down to waist height is gonna act the same (for pachy)? Also, gastornis and titanaboa never should've been where they were, that was an oversight. If they rebalance megalania, I'll switch it back. As it stands now ingame, it definitely deserves aggressive status. This is Pachycephalosaurus we are talking about. If the F/A devs really made Pachy that small, either they messed up or they did not get proper feedback; I am pretty confident the real version, which stood at a taller height than Achillobator (a dromaeosaur just as tall as a Jurassic Park raptor), would have been pretty aggressive to anything that wasn't massive. Hmm. Well if it really is an error and it's recorrected, I'll switch it back to territorial.