Talk:Prehistoric Creatures/@comment-27522058-20160105222533/@comment-25118285-20160106211116

"accurate depends on what paper you read"

Lets take spinosaurus for example. Theres a paper from 2014 that proposed the "new" quadruped and aquatic spinosaurus. Then theres the 2015 paper that says all the research from 2014 spino was actually a completely different dinosaur - sigilmassasaurus. Now 2016 says that the research from 2014 was a juvenile species.

Simple fact is, sometimes scientists don't agree with each other, so then what do you believe? what is "accurate" if so much is controversial?