Talk:Spinosaurus/@comment-26517339-20160820221851/@comment-6030742-20160828131828

Uh, no it doesn't. The sigilmassasaurus study puts ibrahim's findings (S. morrocanus) and the second "type" of spinosaurid Ostrom found (S. B) as synonyms of sigilmassasaurus. So no, it's not just the neck but all recent findings that belong to sigilmassasaurus. Also, there is a third completely separate study that shows that the legs were that of a juvenile as opposed to Ibrahim's proposed sub-adult making the proportions right again. I don't know about you but I'm inclined to believe two completely separate studies over one heavily disputed one.