Thread:ASDFGirl/@comment-30300546-20161023071726/@comment-6040659-20161025230312

AstrothRedEye wrote: Restating what i ment to write before it was all deleted

I understand the Spinosaurus was a mainly piscivorous creature, and i believe that it would have hunted small-medium creatures, I aslo lmow that the Spinosaurus which lived in the age where pangea ( the super continent ) was spliting. In times such as those food would be scarce for larger creautres aswell as scavanging being more common place.

On the matter of a Quadrapeldle or Bipedle Spinosaurus i understand that the only "Evidence" i have is a few collar and arm bones, The main matter is that of the pelvic size being smaller in the diagram, and measurements ( creating the idea that whay we have theorized for now is wrong ( or we have found another sub-species ) ) and that is all explained in The Article Here, i hope this gives you the thought i actually research this, and have my own opinion on the matter

And finnaly in the case that the Revival Dev's want the Spinosaurus to have a "Special Animation where is pickes it up, shakes it, and eats it." is on a general way, kinda biased. . . but i do have to agree as biased as it is, it was a shock when it did that to my friend

As the Spinosaurus has a lager mass than the Tyrannosaurus i can under stand a health gap between the two, but the amount of HP the Rex has comparative to the Spino throws me off while its mass doesn't convince me

Please under stand my point of view towards this matter, and i appologize on coming off as an ass.

And why is the community here, save a few kind and informative people, general assholes

And i can't really explain the things in T-rex and Spino, Who sent it ? Ah, it's OK.