User blog comment:Adsper/All Possible Mobs/@comment-2001:5B0:45C4:75D0:0:FF:FEBF:47C0-20180619180137/@comment-6040659-20180624164936

^ *cough cough*(Giganotosaurus fan denying facts that don't conform to his pre-conceived opinions) *cough cough*

Anyways, whoever said "that isolated jaw fragment indicates at the very most an animal 6% longer than the Holotype, witch is roughly 42 and a half feet long" is on the right track. It's a jaw fragment 6% longer than that of the holotype, and the 13.2 meter long estimate was tentative, yet everyone takes it for granted and says that Giganotosaurus was utterly massive and was able to suplex a giant sauropod in packs of 10.

If we were to take the conservative jaw Giga estimate into account, it would be 12.5 meters in length and 7.3 tonnes, as opposed to these T.rex specimens:


 * Stan: 11.8 meters and 7.2 tonnes
 * "Manospondylus": 11.9 meters and 7.5 tonnes
 * Sue: 12.4 meters and 8.8 tonnes

So, to whoever keeps on saying that whoever says that "Giganotosaurus was only slightly larger than T.rex" is frickin' stupid, please check yourself before you wreck yourself.