Talk:Spinosaurus/@comment-203.184.39.60-20140917192116/@comment-6030742-20140918222301

Nope, I am. Spinosaurus was not quadrupedal, it could not walk on all fours. If you were so biologically obsessed you'd see why. Spinosaurus could not pronate it's hands, it could not move them very much. Take that and the density of it's bones and it would barely crawl on all fours. Then there are the claws. What use do they have? The structure of them is not for slashing nor do they help with swimming. But back on track, how would we even know what profile it had beforehand? That's like saying "You should have predicted the future! How could you not?!". A part of the exaggeration in the original article is the quadrupedal stance (even in the new walking animation they cheated the natural movement of the arms).