Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-80.218.29.246-20150814113429/@comment-28536446-20160613143355

Monolith77 wrote: CaptainJCruise wrote: Monolith77 wrote: TheJaiganticBridge wrote: I just did.

I was never a fan of the Rex and I never will be, it is overused, overpopular and overrated, some of these words may say the same thing but I don't care, you get my point.

People dise things and sometimes, there is nothing anyone can do about it.

And I am not trying to sound to serious if that is what you are getting from this but I don't know how I would say it in a more friendly fashion, actually I probably do, all well Same here. Every theropod must be compared with the rex, even ceratosaurs, very distant relatives of the rex. Ceratosaurus is the ancestor of the Abeilosauride: Carnotorus, Abeilosaurus. Also relatives with Dilophosaurus. Relitives of the T. rex would be Albertosaurus, Tarbosaurus, Appalachinosaurus, Dilong, Guanlong, Coelosaurus, and so on and so forth. Allosaurus is the relitive of the Charcharodontides: Giginotosaurus, Acrocanthosaurus, and Charcharodontosaurus.

By the way it is spelled "desized" and that is T. rex's actual size compared to them. 4-4.3 meters tall and 12-13 meters long. 1. Ceratosaurus is a relative of abelisaurs. Dilophosaurus is apparently in a group outside Averostra, meaning it's a very primitive animal. Appalachiosaurus, Dilong, and Guanlong are in Tyrannosauroidea, which is closer to T. rex than, say, raptors but they split very early from other Tyrannosaurs. Same with Coelurosaurs: they're closer to rex than Carnosaurs.

2. What does "desized" have to do with my previous reply? T. rex is, according to Wikipedia(I know itt could be unreliable) is 12.3 metres long and 4 metres tall at the hip. Monolith77, That is exactly what I was saying, but Dilophosaurus is concidered a Ceratosaur. By the way I quoted the wrong person, sorry.