Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25118285-20160123194552/@comment-24866233-20160331194123

213.120.234.109 wrote: 213.120.234.130 wrote: ASDFGirl wrote: 213.120.234.130 wrote: 213.120.234.109 wrote: I've always prefered the previous 1.7 T. rex model to this one. The legs just looked too far back in my opinion. Nevermind, the head is just so out of proportion that it makes the legs look like they are out of balance. You were saying? Need I say more? I mean, not to be rude but the skull of the model far outsizes the skull of the skeletal and even most of the neck. And just by looking at it I can see it does look a little goofy. Again, no offence to the developers (they are doing a great job) but the skull does need to be revised. The issue is that the skeletal drawings by Scott Hartman only include black outlines that represent muscle rather than skin, so the skeletal drawings won't be completely the same as the actual model itself.