Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-27500445-20151230081039/@comment-27157581-20160126225219

If they start to argue about the hump-sail thing, then I will lose all faith in humanity. Oh wait, I already did...

Anyway, I don't understand the whole thing about Sigilmassasaurus. They only found bits and pieces, and now they're questioning if all the Spinosaurus bones they've are really Sigilmassa. They also found water chemical traces in Spino bones that say that it was aquatic. They also found Onchopristis bones in Spino jaws. I don't understand the problem there. The size, can't all the bones be from different ages of Spino, not Sigilmassa. I doubt Sigilmassa is even real.