Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25118285-20160117172321/@comment-6040659-20160220024117

59.101.94.232 wrote:

PCAwesomeness wrote:

TheJaiganticBridge wrote: I would like to apologise for my over reacting, I made afew mets up posts that day and I was my best. Most of the place I get my info I don't remember were it is so I can't give many links, the plesiosaur I am talking about is about the size of a seal and I got that mixed up with the biggest plesiosaur, sorry my bad Actually, no plesiosaur can go on land.

It's not like they needed to, anyways. I will continue to disagree with you until I have prof or a VERY good reason for a seal sized plesiosaur species wouldn't go to shore Their considerable bulk would limit them from going on land.

Besides, they gave birth to live young!

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/prediction-confirmed-plesiosaurs-were-viviparous/