Thread:ASDFGirl/@comment-30300546-20161023071726/@comment-10943908-20161024024137

Alright, Astroth, I've bolded everything which you wrote and wrote my own responses below each paragraph. Hopefully this makes some sense.

'''I understand the Spinosaurus was a mainly piscivorous creature, and i believe that it would have hunted small-medium creatures, I aslo lmow that the Spinosaurus which lived in the age where pangea ( the super continent ) was spliting. In times such as those food would be scarce for larger creautres aswell as scavanging being more common place.'''

This, to my understanding, is simply a statement of facts, used to set up your later statements. Seems good, and I believe it's generally accepted.

On the matter of a Quadrapeldle or Bipedle Spinosaurus i understand that the only "Evidence" i have is a few collar and arm bones, The main matter is that of the pelvic size being smaller in the diagram, and measurements ( creating the idea that whay we have theorized for now is wrong ( or we have found another sub-species ) ) and that is all explained in The Article Here, i hope this gives you the thought i actually research this, and have my own opinion on the matter

I'm not entirely sure what you are arguing for here, as the article seems to suggest a more bipedal form than what I think you are suggesting. However, if you are implying that the article's conclusion supports shorter limbs than what the current F/A Spinosaurus has, well, I wouldn't know exactly if the ratio is correct. My personal opinion on the matter is that the subject of Spinosaurus limb proportions is too controversial for any one option to be chosen as definite. I guess that at this point, there are enough valid opinions on the subject that we can't really say, without a doubt, that any one opinion is correct. Agreed?

'''And finnaly in the case that the Revival Dev's want the Spinosaurus to have a "Special Animation where is pickes it up, shakes it, and eats it." is on a general way, kinda biased. . . but i do have to agree as biased as it is, it was a shock when it did that to my friend'''

I think that might be a shock, yes. But I think that if the Dev's could find a way to avoid the single-hit=kill method while maintaining the unique attack, they would. So, giving this issue some time provide a change in the future which appeases more of us!

As the Spinosaurus has a lager mass than the Tyrannosaurus i can under stand a health gap between the two, but the amount of HP the Rex has comparative to the Spino throws me off while its mass doesn't convince me

A valid point, though I haven't paid enough attention to the health values of various mobs to know if they are reasonable. I think this one is written well enough that most of us can understand it.

'''Please under stand my point of view towards this matter, and i appologize on coming off as an. '''

Likewise, I apologize for any rudeness which I might display.

And why is the community here, save a few kind and informative people, general .

There certainly are some issues within the community on this wikia, but I think that generally, people mean well. Their interpretation of well might be what is coming into question here. On this wikia, I believe that one opinion is that being right is more important than being nice. That, in my opinion, is a problem, but I can understand why some people might believe differently. 

And i can't really explain the things in T-rex and Spino, Who sent it ?

I'm sorry, this is the one part which I can't understand, but there's a good chance that I am only failing to understand it due to how exhausted I am right now.

---

Well, I hope I understood what you said adequately enough. Best wishes!